
author: Ted Chiang
name: Elaine
average rating: 3.90
book published: 2010
rating: 4
read at: 2010/10/25
date added: 2010/10/26
shelves: sci-fi
review:
Very short novel, more like a novella — I read most of it during a lunch break. But clear, clever, delightful and thoughtful. The two protagonist develop in somewhat different but parallel ways in their relationships with each other and with the digital creatures that they adopt. The whole thing feels very naturalistic and plausible. The illustrations and faux maps are a nice touch, too.
The Best 30-minute Recipe: A Best Recipe Classic (Best Recipe Series)
author: Cook’s Illustrated
name: Elaine
average rating: 4.14
book published: 2006
rating: 4
read at: 2010/10/26
date added: 2010/10/26
shelves: cookbook, own
review:
Picked up at the friends of the library book sale; I paid $2 extra for it because all I had was a 5, but it’s worth every penny.
I’m not really "done" with it, since I’ve only made a handful of recipes, but those few have made it worth every penny: stir-fry, "roast" chicken, chicken teriyaki, two different variations of potatoes. They definitely finish up in about 30 minutes, a little longer the first time around — or in the case of the stir-fry, if you don’t have precut veggies — but after the first time they get faster to make. The notes about timing of preparation help, too.
Looking forward to expanding out the breadth of recipes: most cookbooks I’ve owned, I’ve had just one or two recipes that I make, and ignore most of the rest. (Which is why I photocopied those recipes and gave a bunch of cookbooks to the library.) This one, I think I’ll end up with quite a few regulars, which makes me very happy.
The Best 30-minute Recipe: A Best Recipe Classic (Best Recipe Series)

author: Cook’s Illustrated
name: Elaine
average rating: 4.07
book published: 2006
rating: 4
read at: 2010/10/26
date added: 2010/10/26
shelves: cookbook, own
review:
Picked up at the friends of the library book sale; I paid $2 extra for it because all I had was a 5, but it’s worth every penny.
I’m not really “done” with it, since I’ve only made a handful of recipes, but those few have made it worth every penny: stir-fry, “roast” chicken, chicken teriyaki, two different variations of potatoes. They definitely finish up in about 30 minutes, a little longer the first time around — or in the case of the stir-fry, if you don’t have precut veggies — but after the first time they get faster to make. The notes about timing of preparation help, too.
Looking forward to expanding out the breadth of recipes: most cookbooks I’ve owned, I’ve had just one or two recipes that I make, and ignore most of the rest. (Which is why I photocopied those recipes and gave a bunch of cookbooks to the library.) This one, I think I’ll end up with quite a few regulars, which makes me very happy.
Don’t go changing
When I was a teenager, I thought about this often. My father died when I was eight, and so in the chaos of my home life after that, I would daydream about what things would have been like. I’ve mused about that one often, turning it over in my head, especially as I’ve gotten older and learned more about my father and more about the world in general.
And then later, I was full of regrets about dumb things I had done, ways I had behaved poorly to others, and so forth.
I’m trying to remember what specific event triggered it, but at some point in college I decided that it was worthless to regret past choices. I want to say that it was related to the long-term drama of my friendship with K. Something about realizing that even really shitty times contributed to things that turned out pretty good, considering. (Oh, that’s not vague AT ALL.) And in fact, that long-term drama is probably my personal touchstone for “that thing that you thought you understood? nope, it’s going to be different than that.” (Which reminds me that I need to figure out a present for a great kid’s 13th (!!!!) birthday.)
With that went a decision that trying to work out alternate personal histories was an exercise in futility. Not that it’s not entertaining sometimes: I’m firmly convinced that there’s an alternate reality in which I am an adjunct English prof in Arizona or something. But it can also be wrenchingly painful, and quite possibly wrong.
Curiously enough, I tend to tie myself up in knots thinking about my personal politics of all things, when musing about “if Dad hadn’t died.” I’m pretty lefty, and not just with my handwriting. Dad, on the other hand, was not just 20 years Air Force, but according to other family members, fairly conservative. (He converted TO Catholicism, although I’m not entirely sure of the circumstances. And an uncle told me several years ago that he was passionate about utility deregulation. I’ve occasionally wondered what he would have thought of Enron.) On top of that, he and Mom always disagreed about politics, to the point that they had an agreement not to talk about politics at all.
Whereas when I was a teen and preteen, Mom watched the Sunday morning politics shows, and argued loudly with the TV, and we watched a lot of news, read the paper, etc. I registered voters for the Dukakis campaign when I was only 13. I was passionate about nuclear disarmament at about the same age, and a little earlier. Would I have had those opinions then — or my current ones now — if he’d been around as an influence? If so, would we have fought about it? Because my memories of Dad don’t include the struggles for independence that I fought with Mom later — and there were some doozies — so they’ve got a bit of rose-tinting to them. That’s the dark side of the alternate personal history: not just good things that might never have been, but bad things that might have happened.
I swear I’ve written about this before, because it’s something I’ve definitely (obviously!) thought about, but I have no idea when or what keywords to go searching with.
Other alternative history turning points that I’ve mused on: going to UPS. not going to library school. dating Raul (or yes, C). not going to Austin in ’97 to visit HA, and a few other things in relation to her. learning to bike later in life. All of which reinforces the idea that it’s all interconnected in really complicated ways. (Cue It’s a Wonderful Life.)
Scars of childhood, the non-figurative kind
I have two scars of note, both of which involve being somewhat more adventurous than I think my parents appreciated.
The first I don’t remember getting. The way I understand it, I was a toddler, and rather curious in the way that toddlers are. And somehow I managed to get into the garage, which in that house my father used as a shop, and it had a great many sharp or powered tools. I can visualize the little ranch house, that we lived in until I was seven, and the pressboard door between the main house and the garage. I don’t know if I’m making this up, but I swear I remember it being kept closed with a hook high up on the door. I imagine that the hook was a new innovation after I got into the garage.
According to mom, I went directly from dragging myself around on my belly like a seal to walking, without a crawling phase in the middle. So I would have been walking by then, and I was always a tall kid. Perhaps even tall enough to open the door by myself. But I don’t remember any of this, so I couldn’t have been much older than three, maybe three and a half? (My very first memory is of being at preschool with my “boyfriend.”)
In any case, somehow I got into the shop, and wandered about, and somehow (oh, somehow!) turned on a saw? I think mom said once that it was a band saw. How the hell I got high up enough to turn on a band saw boggles the mind. The toddler mind sees “ooh, moving stuff!” and reaches out to touch….
Did I scream? Considering the second story, I’m really wondering if I did. I definitely sliced my finger, maybe two fingers. The doctor told mom and dad that I was lucky: if I’d cut my finger slightly differently, I’d have completely lost the tip. How’s that for scary? Mom says she can never remember exactly which finger, but when I look at my right hand, two of the fingers have odd divots/lines on them, nearly perpendicular to the rest of the lines, one more than the other. So when I look at those fingers, I can almost visualize the angle at which I grabbed the blade.
It seems strange to me that I should have very nearly lost a fingertip, and yet I can’t remember it. (This is also true for another toddler-era accident, one that didn’t leave a scar: allegedly I jumped off of the sofa right into the coffeetable, and broke one of my front teeth. I had a silver tooth until I was seven years old.)
I do remember getting the other scar: we were still living in that house, and I was seven years old, so it must have been sometime between September 1981 and February 1982. My bedroom in that house was tiny, just barely big enough for my bed and my toy chest. “Chest” is a misnomer: it was a shelving unit which I think must have previously been some sort of store display: dark wood, just a bit taller than the bed. I wish I could remember what the painting on the back of the top shelf said, as that would probably explain what it was before it was my toy chest. All my dolls sat leaning up against each other, both the handmade dolls and my beloved plastic-headed Mandy, whose clothes were folded (or piled) in the shelves below. (I imagine, although I’m not sure, along with stacks of books.)
The fun thing about the shelf was that bit about being just a bit taller than the bed, and its position right at the foot of the bed, with just enough space between the two for a tall skinny 7-year-old to slip between to get out toys or books. That also being enough space, or rather distance, for jumping off of onto the bouncy bed.
Of course I was not supposed to jump from the shelf onto the bed. I had been warned about that, more than once. But I loved the springy bouncy flying feeling of that jump, so I kept doing it when I didn’t think anyone would see me.
Here’s the other half of the equation: a white wooden headboard, with a few stickers on it. That was where my forehead ended up, finally, when I jumped just a bit too vigorously. What I remember now is not the actual strike, but putting my hand to my head and feeling it wet. Then I snuck out of my room to the bathroom: for the better part of thirty years, I’ve described the image in the mirror as “like V8 dripping down the side of my face” — I’d put a gash in my forehead, just above my right eyebrow. I don’t remember any pain, just anxiety about getting in trouble, both because I’d been up past my bedtime and because I’d been doing something I wasn’t supposed to do.
There was an emergency room visit, and stitches, and both are just vague blurs of memory now. I still have a tiny scar, more like a dent; some of the glasses I’ve worn over the years hide it entirely, like the prescription sunglasses I have now. I sometimes rub at it when I’m thinking.
(While writing all this, I realized I have a third scar, on my left hand between the thumb and first finger, where I gashed it with a pruning saw a few years ago, getting a bit too vigorous trying to prune an apple tree that comes out over the fence into our yard. Wear your gloves.)
The thing that strikes me about both of these childhood accidents is an adventuresomeness (?!) that feels surprising and unfamiliar. Somewhere I became physically cautious, nervy about climbing or jumping, anxious about falling. It wasn’t very long after the bed incident: I was terrified learning how to rollerskate, for example, and remember Dad coming home from work one day, after we’d moved to the new house, and taking the stick I was using to balance with, so I’d do it on my own. Similarly with early attempts to learn to ride a bike, which I think I’ve written about before. I was often terrified of diving boards and of roller coasters.
What is it, exactly? A little bit the fear of hurting myself. A little bit the fear of UR DOIN IT RONG. Or that I’m doing something I oughtn’t. (Jumping off a log over the swimming hole at the river this last summer hit all those points something fearsome, and I never did manage it, though C said it was a lot of fun. Then the flow of the river changed, and it definitely wasn’t deep enough to be safe.) The getting in trouble bothered me more than the pain, when I hit my head.
There’s a separate thing about awkwardness and teasing, I think, but that may be something for another time.
And yet: every time I finally got up the nerve to do those things: to go on Space Mountain in junior high, to jump off the rocks in the Apostle Islands on vacation with C, and yes, to finally learn how to ride a bike, I’ve loved it, same as I always loved going on the swings. It’s getting up the nerve that’s the hard part. Maybe when I look at the scars on my fingers, or worry at the one on my forehead, I’ll try to think of the adventuresomeness, and how very small those scars are, really.
Your Brain: The Missing Manual
author: Matthew MacDonald
name: Elaine
average rating: 3.66
book published: 2008
rating: 3
read at: 2010/09/24
date added: 2010/09/29
shelves: non-fiction, psychology, science, self-help
review:
For someone who’s read a lot on psychology & brain science, not tons new here. But a nice mini-reference with a fun conversational style and a few "party trick" bits.
Your Brain: The Missing Manual

author: Matthew MacDonald
name: Elaine
average rating: 3.62
book published: 2008
rating: 3
read at: 2010/09/24
date added: 2010/09/29
shelves: non-fiction, psychology, science, self-help
review:
For someone who’s read a lot on psychology & brain science, not tons new here. But a nice mini-reference with a fun conversational style and a few “party trick” bits.
Whew…
Things of note:
Costochondritis (ie, “chest wall pain”), which causes chest pain, pressure, shortness of breath, etc. – all that stuff that sounds remarkably like a heart attack when you describe it over the phone to a nurse. That would be the first day of my vacation, the Saturday of Labor Day weekend. Hours in the ER, just hanging out waiting. In all seriousness, I cried when the doc said it wasn’t a heart attack, because, well: I lost 50+ pounds in order to avoid that fate. Unfortunately, exacerbated by bicycling up hills, at least with my current stem setup, and recurred on my first day back to work after the vacation, when I tried bike commuting.
Rain. One of the rainiest Septembers ever. Ever. Plenty of it during my vacation. (Chilly, too.)
Server crash, because some jackass on some construction project took out some chunk of the internet. Took out the connection to online banking; not the main website, except that there was some sort of horrible backwards cascade that DID take out the server, and then there were issues with the backup server. And I could not do a single thing. (Plus, as it happens, I came in before 6am that day to update Drupal, which went fine, but couldn’t leave until I’d heard something about the server, even thought I couldn’t do anything. Talk about loopy.)
Spider bite, although no idea where exactly, or what spider either. Reaching down to scratch my calf: huh, that’s itchy. Oh My God that’s itchy. And red, and kinda swelled up. But had to go to a meeting that had been hard to get set up. So Urgent Care after that, all they can say is, huh, looks like maybe a bug bite? Next day foot & ankle swollen double-size, can’t walk, or hardly, and finally something that actually looks like a specific bite spot. It did go down, back to normal, after a few days…and some oral steroids courtesy my normal doc. (Who, by the by, is also now having me take bunches of ibuprofen for that chest wall thing. No, I still haven’t gotten a new bike stem to try out. Yay procrastination & indecision.)
And then rounded out the last week of the month with three days in a row of volunteer meetings, including OMG SO DAMN BORING LECTURE (please don’t tell anyone I said so), which meant damn little downtime.
Plus more car commuting this month than, well, ever. Not terrible, but more tiring than I’d’ve expected. Everything in September was more tiring, to be honest. Didn’t even manage to keep up with August’s pace of freewriting, let alone make any progress editing NaNo ’09.
On the plus side? Visiting with some friends the morning of my birthday (with coffeecake!), hanging out with librarians at Table for Olympia, being really organized putting together the ENA newsletter. That, and yesterday pulled out the stops and was the nicest day in pretty much the entire month. Then today I went to a writers’ group at Orca Books, and that was quite inspirational. Plus I have two more days off, which also look to be pleasant weather. But mostly I’m just trying to run down the clock without anything else insane happening, and without complaining too much about the month that was.
Keep your fingers crossed for me.
Delusions of Gender
author: Cordelia Fine
name: Elaine
average rating: 4.16
book published: 2010
rating: 5
read at: 2010/09/23
date added: 2010/09/23
shelves: gender, non-fiction, psychology, science, sociology
review:
I happened to run across this book at the library having forgotten that it was in my "to-read" list. I’m SO glad I did, and given a certain pair of somewhat ranty posts a couple of months back, only wish I’d read it sooner! I literally could not put it down – as in: "no really, I need to go to bed/back to my desk from lunch/off the bus, I have to put the book away."
In short, social construction of gender: you’re soaking in it. (And especially, your brain is soaking in it.)
1) Priming & stereotype threat affect everything. Just checking gender on a form before taking a test changes womens’ performance, especially on math tests. More priming (being told that the test relates to gender, watching a gender-stereotyped commercial, etc) increases the effect.
2) Most of the "science" as it’s filtered through to the popular media is a disaster of half-baked assumptions, small and/or poorly-constructed experiments, and willful misunderstanding of the actual results. (She tears apart one popular writer; it’s kinda fun.)
3) Worse, those lame results create a feedback loop, combined with the impossibility of gender-neutral child-rearing, that increases the problem of stereotype threat, and makes genuine social change more difficult.
Le sigh. Not only is the feminist struggle not over, we may actually be hitting a really hard spot.
On the plus side, I’m fired up now. Not just that, but I’m thinking more about my own personal construction of gender identity, including my history with math and science.
There’s a post I wrote about my life with math a while back, and there I wrote about it as a choice between writing and math – now I’m seriously looking back and wondering about the effect of gender stereotypes, and whether I might have come to computing sooner given different circumstances. I think it’s worth noticing that choices exist in a constrained environment, constrained both by the external world, and by our own unexamined or incompletely-formed attitudes.
As for the writing style, it’s a delightful read. She’s got a sharp conversational tone that pulled me in; I even read the footnotes.
HIGHLY recommended, great in combination with Pink Brain Blue Brain.
Delusions of Gender
author: Cordelia Fine
name: Elaine
average rating: 4.21
book published: 2010
rating: 5
read at: 2010/09/23
date added: 2010/09/23
shelves: non-fiction, psychology, science, sociology, gender, favorites
review:
I happened to run across this book at the library having forgotten that it was in my "to-read" list. I’m SO glad I did, and given a certain pair of somewhat ranty posts a couple of months back, only wish I’d read it sooner! I literally could not put it down – as in: "no really, I need to go to bed/back to my desk from lunch/off the bus, I have to put the book away."
In short, social construction of gender: you’re soaking in it. (And especially, your brain is soaking in it.)
1) Priming & stereotype threat affect everything. Just checking gender on a form before taking a test changes womens’ performance, especially on math tests. More priming (being told that the test relates to gender, watching a gender-stereotyped commercial, etc) increases the effect.
2) Most of the "science" as it’s filtered through to the popular media is a disaster of half-baked assumptions, small and/or poorly-constructed experiments, and willful misunderstanding of the actual results. (She tears apart one popular writer; it’s kinda fun.)
3) Worse, those lame results create a feedback loop, combined with the impossibility of gender-neutral child-rearing, that increases the problem of stereotype threat, and makes genuine social change more difficult.
Le sigh. Not only is the feminist struggle not over, we may actually be hitting a really hard spot.
On the plus side, I’m fired up now. Not just that, but I’m thinking more about my own personal construction of gender identity, including my history with math and science.
There’s a post I wrote about my life with math a while back, and there I wrote about it as a choice between writing and math – now I’m seriously looking back and wondering about the effect of gender stereotypes, and whether I might have come to computing sooner given different circumstances. I think it’s worth noticing that choices exist in a constrained environment, constrained both by the external world, and by our own unexamined or incompletely-formed attitudes.
As for the writing style, it’s a delightful read. She’s got a sharp conversational tone that pulled me in; I even read the footnotes.
HIGHLY recommended, great in combination with Pink Brain Blue Brain.


